Debate:What exactly is Conservapedia?
1,343 bytes added
20:39, 20 March 2007
If you could give examples, and if they were reverted to the offensive text after you fixed them, that would be great. Thanks.
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 14:20, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
== Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided==
This is another question I've had. Does this site exist to show all the facts and give the conservative POV or does it exist to give both POVs or does it exist to show just facts that support a conservative agenda ? I think these responses to the dinosaur / evolution debate might be pertinent.
<code>Please stop fighting about this stuff. It is Conservapedia. We're not trying to give both sides evenly. Conservative was right in protecting the article. [[User:Conservapedia Webmaster|Conservapedia Webmaster]] 14:46, 20 March 2007 (EDT)</code>
This appears to be clarified here:
<code>To the broader issue, I have to defer to our Webmaster on this. I might add that "Conservative" has put a great deal of effort into the "dinosaur" entry and it ranks #6 on our most-viewed statistics. It ranks high because it is not like Wikipedia's entry. There is no point to trying to import Wikipedia-type material into the entry. People can go to Wikipedia for that. That said, Conservapedia is responsive to factual, evidentiary suggestions made on the talk page. We are neutral to facts. [[User:Aschlafly]]</code>
Both are from here: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&curid=2516&diff=52230&oldid=52221#request_your_help] [[User:Myk|Myk]] 16:39, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "