Changes

--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:33, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

--[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:33, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

:Yes & no.  It's largely depracated and moot, and in the scheme of history, will be forgotten. Ignorant armies clashed by night.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

:Yes & no.  It's largely depracated and moot, and in the scheme of history, will be forgotten. Ignorant armies clashed by night.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

 

 

:''Aaron H. Coleman. Coleman had been suspended in 1946 for not keeping classified documents he’d taken home in a safe with a three combination lock. Army officials had determined that the documents, which were of little importance, had been used for personal study rather than any attempt at passing on information, but McCarthy declared that Coleman, who was guilty of having been a college classmate of Julius Rosenberg, “may have been the direct link between the laboratories and the Rosenberg Spy Ring. [11] ''

:''Aaron H. Coleman. Coleman had been suspended in 1946 for not keeping classified documents he’d taken home in a safe with a three combination lock. Army officials had determined that the documents, which were of little importance, had been used for personal study rather than any attempt at passing on information, but McCarthy declared that Coleman, who was guilty of having been a college classmate of Julius Rosenberg, “may have been the direct link between the laboratories and the Rosenberg Spy Ring. [11] ''

I will comment on the telegram later tonight. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 16:14, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

I will comment on the telegram later tonight. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 16:14, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

:How's this; let's place the Coleman material & whatever else is relevent in [[United States Army Signal Corps]].  Here's another good first hand account [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Transcript of an interview with Ruth Young Watt], via Senate.gov --[[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:17, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

So what? Namedropping.  Who cares.  It was ''not'' Carl Jung. Then the context goes form plural, "associates", to singular, "this professor". Can this section be repaired?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:20, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

This specifically we have discussed twice now; "called as a witness" is not necessarily the same as "being investigated".  Can this be clarified?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

What does this mean? A "potential witness" is not necessarily a subject of an investigation.  Can this be clarified?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

*''After the VOA investigation, many of its problems were corrected.''

No context given.  What problems were corrected?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:36, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

*''An investigation had led officials to the conclusion...''

In otherwords, this was not McCarthy.  It was a Committee decision to hold hearings. McCarthy I do not believe chaired these hearings either, and  this is case of Mr. Coleman.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:42, 20 March 2007 (EDT)