| Line 93: |
Line 93: |
| | In 2006 ICR decided to move to [[Texas]] but then encountered the same difficulties. In April 2008 the Academic Excellence and Research Committee of the Texas Higher-Education Coordinating Board voted unanimously to deny the ICR Graduate School's application for accreditation. The Texas Commissioner of Higher Education said only, "Religious beliefs are not science." ICR might appeal the process administratively, submit a new proposal, or sue the State of Texas for injunctive relief. | | In 2006 ICR decided to move to [[Texas]] but then encountered the same difficulties. In April 2008 the Academic Excellence and Research Committee of the Texas Higher-Education Coordinating Board voted unanimously to deny the ICR Graduate School's application for accreditation. The Texas Commissioner of Higher Education said only, "Religious beliefs are not science." ICR might appeal the process administratively, submit a new proposal, or sue the State of Texas for injunctive relief. |
| | | | |
| − | === Court challenges === | + | === Court challenges to education === |
| | | | |
| | In 1925 the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] challenged a [[Tennessee]] law that forbade teaching that man had evolved (it didn't otherwise forbid teaching evolution), in what became known as the [[Scopes Trial]]. | | In 1925 the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] challenged a [[Tennessee]] law that forbade teaching that man had evolved (it didn't otherwise forbid teaching evolution), in what became known as the [[Scopes Trial]]. |
| Line 102: |
Line 102: |
| | ==== Dover County School Board ==== | | ==== Dover County School Board ==== |
| | | | |
| − | {{main|Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District}} | + | {{main|Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District}}. |
| | | | |
| | In 2004, the Dover County School Board in Pennsylvania, U.S.A., approved a curriculum which included that teachers should read to their class a statement pointing out that evolution is an explanation of observations, not a fact, that intelligent design is an alternative explanation, that the book ''Of Pandas and People'' is available if students want to know more about Intelligent design, and that the students are to keep an open mind. | | In 2004, the Dover County School Board in Pennsylvania, U.S.A., approved a curriculum which included that teachers should read to their class a statement pointing out that evolution is an explanation of observations, not a fact, that intelligent design is an alternative explanation, that the book ''Of Pandas and People'' is available if students want to know more about Intelligent design, and that the students are to keep an open mind. |
| Line 112: |
Line 112: |
| | Associate professor of physiology, Dr. Philip Bishop, was taken to court by his employer, the [[University of Alabama]], to stop him briefly expressing his views favouring [[intelligent design]], on the grounds that they were religious. | | Associate professor of physiology, Dr. Philip Bishop, was taken to court by his employer, the [[University of Alabama]], to stop him briefly expressing his views favouring [[intelligent design]], on the grounds that they were religious. |
| | Yet views ''opposing'' religion are routinely expressed in classes with no attempts made to stop them.<ref>Bergman, 2004</ref> | | Yet views ''opposing'' religion are routinely expressed in classes with no attempts made to stop them.<ref>Bergman, 2004</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | ==== Cobb County School District ==== |
| | + | |
| | + | {{main|Selman v. Cobb County School District}}. |
| | + | |
| | + | Even pointing out that students should apply some critical thinking to evolution is unacceptable to the evolutionists. |
| | + | |
| | + | In 2002 the Cobb County School District in [[Georgia]], U.S.A., placed stickers in the front of biology textbooks which simply read: |
| | + | {{QuoteBox|This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered.}} |
| | + | Yet even this innocuous statement was challenged in court, with the ultimate result being that the stickers were removed from the textbooks. |
| | | | |
| | === Peer review publications === | | === Peer review publications === |