Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 45: Line 45:  
::--I would re-order your sections.  Section three, I feel, should be first on the list, as it's the basis for everything else.  Then one, with two and four in any order after that.<br>
 
::--I would re-order your sections.  Section three, I feel, should be first on the list, as it's the basis for everything else.  Then one, with two and four in any order after that.<br>
 
::--''Section Four could be controversial but I wouldn't leave it up to common sense.''  I have great faith in the common sense of homeschooling parents to make the best decisions for their children.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:11, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::--''Section Four could be controversial but I wouldn't leave it up to common sense.''  I have great faith in the common sense of homeschooling parents to make the best decisions for their children.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:11, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Section One states that there will no statement of faith required.  It needs to be first because, as your own comments demonstrate, confusion about other Sections depend on that fundamental issue.
 +
 +
::: When no statement of faith is required (and sometimes even when one is required), it is inevitable that someone (e.g., an atheist) will try to censor the classroom prayer.  Not even religious schools typically say classroom prayers any more.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:38, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
    
'''Article II:  Curriculum.'''  I am assuming here that you are writing this for a group which offers classes to homeschoolers?
 
'''Article II:  Curriculum.'''  I am assuming here that you are writing this for a group which offers classes to homeschoolers?
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,208

edits

Navigation menu