4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: +
reply to Craig's interesting question
::I don't think I'll have much time to add to the site, with work and family commitments my time is scarce. I'll keep an eye on it though and see if theres anything that I can add insight to. The name/space thing's rather academic now.
::I don't think I'll have much time to add to the site, with work and family commitments my time is scarce. I'll keep an eye on it though and see if theres anything that I can add insight to. The name/space thing's rather academic now.
::What is the opinion of the site on the internet? Its uncontrolled nature worries me, allowing anyone from terrorists to paedophiles to have access to our children. [[User:CraigW|CraigW]] 16:32, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
::What is the opinion of the site on the internet? Its uncontrolled nature worries me, allowing anyone from terrorists to paedophiles to have access to our children. [[User:CraigW|CraigW]] 16:32, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
:::I'm not sure what CP's official stance is, but my own is that the internet should be regulated to prevent child pornography and the spread of terrorism and from dangerous information (national secrets, how to build bombs, etc) from falling in the wrong hands. These should be handled by law enforcement officials and we should support legislation that gives them more power to police the internet because as of now it's extremely difficult for them to find offender and catch them. Case in point, the FBI took several days to find the hacker of Sarah Palin's email, and they were only given quicker access to pertinent information because this was a high profile case. They should have had this hacker within a day -- the hack (=[[trespassing]]) happened on US soil after all. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 16:55, 28 September 2008 (EDT)