201
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 3:
Line 3: + +
Talk:Sex education (view source)
Revision as of 22:12, September 29, 2008
, 22:12, September 29, 2008Grumble, grumble... this is not conservative.
Considering that this is a hot-button issue, don't you think we should have a debate about it? [[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 20:34, 5 February 2008 (EST)<br /><br />
Considering that this is a hot-button issue, don't you think we should have a debate about it? [[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 20:34, 5 February 2008 (EST)<br /><br />
Can't they just use the same method that scared me away from sex? My high school showed STD videos.. like the worst stages of getting one. -^_^- [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy]] 20:42, 5 February 2008 (EST)
Can't they just use the same method that scared me away from sex? My high school showed STD videos.. like the worst stages of getting one. -^_^- [[User:Kektklik|Fuzzy]] 20:42, 5 February 2008 (EST)
:This doesn't seem very conservative. It's all about how ineffective abstinance education is. Probably true, but irrelivant: Conservatives know that sex ed is about more than safe sex, it's about promoting moral values and Christian virtue. Comprehensive sex ed may keep the teens safe from pregnency and STI, but at the expense of turning them away from God, so we need to give our full support to abstinance. I urge a rewrite to strip all the pro-sex and anti-abstinance parts - which leaves three paragraphs. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 18:12, 29 September 2008 (EDT)