: CMarius, thanks for your insights. I welcome your contributions, and I don't disagree with your comments above. Marbury is not very objectionable. However, I think the pattern of Marshall's decisions, and their aggressiveness at establishing federal power (particularly power by the federal judiciary), are objectionable. And his tenure of 35 years? If 8 years was enough for George Washington, I don't see how Marshall justified being in charge for 35.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:32, 29 September 2008 (EDT) | : CMarius, thanks for your insights. I welcome your contributions, and I don't disagree with your comments above. Marbury is not very objectionable. However, I think the pattern of Marshall's decisions, and their aggressiveness at establishing federal power (particularly power by the federal judiciary), are objectionable. And his tenure of 35 years? If 8 years was enough for George Washington, I don't see how Marshall justified being in charge for 35.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:32, 29 September 2008 (EDT) |