Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
102 bytes added ,  16:02, September 30, 2008
no edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:  
Alright, it's been over 24 hours and nothing has come of the talk page. I'm going to rewrite the article using references. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:33, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 
Alright, it's been over 24 hours and nothing has come of the talk page. I'm going to rewrite the article using references. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:33, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Done and done. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:56, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Done and done. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:56, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
::<Passes HelpJazz a nice cup of tea and a bun> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:02, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
    
==Minor changes==
 
==Minor changes==
 
I don't want to get into the above debate about the nature of this article, but I think there are a few things that could be done to make the article better.  First, I'd suggest that "liberals and hippies" could be changed to just "liberals."  If you think Liberals and hippies are the same thing, then it's redundant.  On the other hand, if they aren't the same, then it doesn't make sense to include hippies since this article talks about strictly conservative values, which would be in direct opposition to liberal values.  Also, "square" is itself an outdated slang term that most people don't use anymore (which, ironically, would mean some consider it "old fashioned") so maybe just "stuffy" would be better.  Also the second to last sentence could be split into two to improve its readability.  I'd change it myself, but it seems like this is a contentious article, and I don't want to step on anyone's toes are anything.  These are just suggestions of course, sorry if I overstepped any bounds.  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 18:17, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 
I don't want to get into the above debate about the nature of this article, but I think there are a few things that could be done to make the article better.  First, I'd suggest that "liberals and hippies" could be changed to just "liberals."  If you think Liberals and hippies are the same thing, then it's redundant.  On the other hand, if they aren't the same, then it doesn't make sense to include hippies since this article talks about strictly conservative values, which would be in direct opposition to liberal values.  Also, "square" is itself an outdated slang term that most people don't use anymore (which, ironically, would mean some consider it "old fashioned") so maybe just "stuffy" would be better.  Also the second to last sentence could be split into two to improve its readability.  I'd change it myself, but it seems like this is a contentious article, and I don't want to step on anyone's toes are anything.  These are just suggestions of course, sorry if I overstepped any bounds.  [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 18:17, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
3,303

edits

Navigation menu