4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + +
reply to Taj
::::::I have absolutely no idea what you are off on a tangent about now. My opinion is that we don't need to include an anagram of Barack Obama's name. (This is the "Anagram" talk page, hello?) Whatever else you have issues with, take up with those people at those places... mmmkay? thanx [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:51, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
::::::I have absolutely no idea what you are off on a tangent about now. My opinion is that we don't need to include an anagram of Barack Obama's name. (This is the "Anagram" talk page, hello?) Whatever else you have issues with, take up with those people at those places... mmmkay? thanx [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:51, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::::Karajou is ignoring me. o.O [[User:NathanG|Nate]] <sup>[[User_talk:NathanG|my opinion matters?]]</sup> 14:53, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::::Karajou is ignoring me. o.O [[User:NathanG|Nate]] <sup>[[User_talk:NathanG|my opinion matters?]]</sup> 14:53, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
(to Taj) Yes, we want to build a reputable encyclopedia, but that comes from having strong entries on serious topics. This entry and its examples are more of a fun page rather than some scholarly treatise. So there's freedom to have some silly anagrams, like the Obama one or the Ross Perot and George Bush ones. Should we remove the Ross Perot one as well? It doesn't say something positive about him, but I think it's ultimately harmless and clearly a joke like the Obama one. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:39, 30 September 2008 (EDT)