Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
926 bytes removed ,  22:52, March 20, 2007
→‎Conflicting Opinions/Data: The idea that PRO global warming scientists aren't getting the word out is laughable - deleting original research
Line 56: Line 56:  
== Conflicting Opinions/Data ==
 
== Conflicting Opinions/Data ==
   −
The global warming theory is a scientific theory, that has been supported by many peer-reviewed journal articles, published in highly respected international scientific journals.
+
The global warming theory is a scientific theory, that has been supported by many peer-reviewed journal articles, published in highly respected international scientific journals.
−
 
  −
Many scientists who have demonstrated support for the global warming theory have been silenced or censored by United States government officials<ref>http://www.rense.com/general75/oppo.htm</ref><ref>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53636</ref><ref>http://www.variousandsundry.com/politics/?p=810</ref><ref>http://www.newswithviews.com/metcalf/metcalf205.htm</ref> <ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/11/ngreen211.xml</ref>, such as [[Philip Cooney]]. There have been numerous reports of death threats made by major oil companies against scientists who refuse to take their bribes and speak out that global warming is really happening.
  −
 
  −
Pro-global warming reports follow scientific method, using both a control and experimental group.  Therefore, the majority of scientists today accept global warming as fact. <ref>http://xtronics.com/reference/globalwarming.htm</ref>
      
== Global warming advocacy sites ==
 
== Global warming advocacy sites ==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu