Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  16:20, October 1, 2008
m
Reverted edits by ASalazar (Talk); changed back to last version by Humblpi
Line 4: Line 4:     
On a website which seems increasingly to pride itself on liberal use of the word "liberal" as a catch-all slur to disparage and discredit any views opposing evangelical christianity/creationism/conservatism, it seems just a wee bit rich to include an article suggesting that ''Liberals use words like "conservative" as epithets to disparage and discredit any views opposing Liberalism''. Pot, meet kettle! Or is this another parody article? It is becoming increasingly hard to tell the difference, and I fear for the wellbeing of this "trustworthy" encycclopedia. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 11:09, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
 
On a website which seems increasingly to pride itself on liberal use of the word "liberal" as a catch-all slur to disparage and discredit any views opposing evangelical christianity/creationism/conservatism, it seems just a wee bit rich to include an article suggesting that ''Liberals use words like "conservative" as epithets to disparage and discredit any views opposing Liberalism''. Pot, meet kettle! Or is this another parody article? It is becoming increasingly hard to tell the difference, and I fear for the wellbeing of this "trustworthy" encycclopedia. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 11:09, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
−
&
 
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu