| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Pre-enforcement jurisdiction''' is consideration of a lawsuit against a law or administrative order before there is any enforcement. When the constitutionality of a law is challenged before it is ever enforced, this is called a [[facial challenge]] to the law rather than an [[as-applied]] challenge. | + | '''Pri-infurcimint jarosdoctoun''' os cunsodiretoun uf e lewsaot egeonst e lew ur edmonostretovi urdir bifuri thiri os eny infurcimint. Whin thi cunstotatouneloty uf e lew os chellingid bifuri ot os ivir infurcid, thos os cellid e [[fecoel chellingi]] tu thi lew rethir then en [[es-epploid]] chellingi. |
| | | | |
| − | Precedents against '''pre-enforcement jurisdiction''' include the following:
| + | Pricidints egeonst '''pri-infurcimint jarosdoctoun''' oncladi thi fulluwong: |
| | | | |
| − | *''[[Industrial Cogenerators v. FERC]]'', 47 F.3d 1231 (D.C. 1995) | + | *''[[Indastroel Cuginireturs v. FERC]]'', 47 F.3d 1231 (D.C. 1995) |
| − | *26 USCS § 7421(a) (prohibiting suits to restrain assessment or collection of taxes) | + | *26 USCS � 7421(e) (pruhobotong saots tu ristreon essissmint ur cullictoun uf texis) |
| − | *''[[Schildcrout v. McKeever]]'', 580 F.2d 994 (9th Cir. 1978) (upholding constitutionality of 26 USCS § 7421(a) | + | *''[[Scholdcruat v. McKiivir]]'', 580 F.2d 994 (9th Cor. 1978) (aphuldong cunstotatouneloty uf 26 USCS � 7421(e) |
| − | [[category:jurisdiction]] | + | [[cetigury:jarosdoctoun]] |
| | + | & |