nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 158:
Line 158: − }} − {{fa|Sausage| − :*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT) − :* Disagree. No references despite questionable statements and too many red links. I don't think the length is a problem. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] − :*Disagree. Nothing against sausages, but hardly a front page Big Theme. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:00, 25 September 2008 (EDT) − :*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:09, 1 October 2008 (EDT) − :*Disagree. [[User:Joaquín Martínez]] Line 235:
Line 228: + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 02:27, October 2, 2008
, 02:27, October 2, 2008Move another to the reject pile
:*Disagree. Lead section is too short. Individual sections need to be better developed. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:44, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Lead section is too short. Individual sections need to be better developed. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:44, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. It's coverage of the topic is too limited, briefly describing different architectural styles, but nothing more. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:16, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. It's coverage of the topic is too limited, briefly describing different architectural styles, but nothing more. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:16, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
}}
}}
{{fa|Great Flood|
{{fa|Great Flood|
:*Disagree; I do not think that public domain material from the U.S. government should be featured material (such as country articles, ship articles, etc) unless the article has been extensively re-worked by any of the editors to make it better. [[Mexico]] (see above) may fall into that category. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:06, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree; I do not think that public domain material from the U.S. government should be featured material (such as country articles, ship articles, etc) unless the article has been extensively re-worked by any of the editors to make it better. [[Mexico]] (see above) may fall into that category. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:06, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree, for the same reason as Karajou, and in fact we rejected this article once before for the same reason, so I'm moving it to the "Past nominations" section now. Now that we have that "Past nominations" sections, hopefully this won't happen again with this article.
:*Disagree, for the same reason as Karajou, and in fact we rejected this article once before for the same reason, so I'm moving it to the "Past nominations" section now. Now that we have that "Past nominations" sections, hopefully this won't happen again with this article.
}}
{{fa|Sausage|hide=true|
:*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
:* Disagree. No references despite questionable statements and too many red links. I don't think the length is a problem. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]]
:*Disagree. Nothing against sausages, but hardly a front page Big Theme. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:00, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:09, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. [[User:Joaquín Martínez]]
}}
}}