1,106
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − − Intelligent design looks to the order of the world as evidence of a designer, but [[George Hammond]] may have found stronger proof based on psychometric experiments.
reverting George Hammond stuff
The major flaw with so-called Intelligent Design is that it in fact explains nothing. Instead of offering disprovable hypotheses to explain the origin and diversity of life on earth it invokes magic. Most reputable scientists are quick to point out the problem of infinite regression that dooms ID. "If God created the Universe, then who (or what) created God?" ID ends up mired in the irreducible complexity it purports to solve.
The major flaw with so-called Intelligent Design is that it in fact explains nothing. Instead of offering disprovable hypotheses to explain the origin and diversity of life on earth it invokes magic. Most reputable scientists are quick to point out the problem of infinite regression that dooms ID. "If God created the Universe, then who (or what) created God?" ID ends up mired in the irreducible complexity it purports to solve.
To date there has been one peer-reviewed article supporting Intelligent Design in the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640] However, the journal later withdrew the article citing improper reviewing practices. [http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html]
To date there has been one peer-reviewed article supporting Intelligent Design in the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640] However, the journal later withdrew the article citing improper reviewing practices. [http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html]