Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3,451 bytes added ,  13:15, October 2, 2008
Information, evidence vs. proof, and your (lack of) knowledge of the Bible.
Line 67: Line 67:     
Von Daniken! Thats him! Thankyou, yes I love that guys writing, sure it's probably all completely wrong, but its great fun to read. No, because, if I remember correctly, his explanation actually didn't ignore anything that the bible said about the story. It explained everything I think, like why Lot's wife became a pillar of salt, and why the angel hurried them out of the city, and why that city was chosen to be nuked or something. And while I definately don't believe any of it is true, it has just as much evidence to support it as the bibles version of events does which casts some doubt onto the Bible's claim to historical accuracy. As for Noah's ark, I still think it has something to do with the end of the last ice age or something like that. I can't prove it, I know. But most civilisations have different flood myths, and you'd think they'd all have the same if a worldwide complete flooding had happened and everyone on earth was descended from Moses. By the way, minor unimportant question, If Adam and Eve had two sons, one of whom killed the other, how did Cain have children? Sorry, it's just kinda bothered me ever since I heard that story... [[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 07:12, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 
Von Daniken! Thats him! Thankyou, yes I love that guys writing, sure it's probably all completely wrong, but its great fun to read. No, because, if I remember correctly, his explanation actually didn't ignore anything that the bible said about the story. It explained everything I think, like why Lot's wife became a pillar of salt, and why the angel hurried them out of the city, and why that city was chosen to be nuked or something. And while I definately don't believe any of it is true, it has just as much evidence to support it as the bibles version of events does which casts some doubt onto the Bible's claim to historical accuracy. As for Noah's ark, I still think it has something to do with the end of the last ice age or something like that. I can't prove it, I know. But most civilisations have different flood myths, and you'd think they'd all have the same if a worldwide complete flooding had happened and everyone on earth was descended from Moses. By the way, minor unimportant question, If Adam and Eve had two sons, one of whom killed the other, how did Cain have children? Sorry, it's just kinda bothered me ever since I heard that story... [[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 07:12, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Yeah, I like to think I'm open-minded too, but I know plenty would disagree with that!
 +
: Your example of the water cycle fails because, like life, you haven't shown that it ''did'' occur naturally (without design).  I could also object on another ground, but that would be tantamount to defining complexity as something that can't occur naturally, which is a valid argument, but perhaps I won't use it right now.
 +
: Your mutation example (also) fails because of a misunderstanding of what "information" is.  [[Information]] is something that conveys ''meaning''.  Words are information.  So if you "mutate" "my name is Philip" to "my nsme is Philip", what new ''information'' is created?  None.  Rather, the information has been ''damaged'' (if not destroyed) (ignoring that our brains are smart enough to figure out what must have been intended).  (And by the way, I created that mutation by "chance", by closing my eyes, cursoring back a few characters, and randomly pressing a key.  I possibly ''could have'' created new information if I had ''intelligently designed'' the "mutation".)  It is false to say that any change constitutes new information.
 +
: Regarding Stanley and Miller's experiment, I already acknowledged that it doesn't rule out all possible explanations.  But the point is that it is positive ''evidence'' opposed to the naturalistic position.  Yes, perhaps it only rules out life ''as we know it'', but then it is this ''life that we know'' that we are talking about.  It's an interesting characteristic of believers in naturalism that they claim to be scientific, but when scientific evidence is presented that opposes their ideas, they resort to ''ad hoc'' speculation to explain away the evidence.  So, it's inaccurate to say that the experiment failed to produce any evidence either way.  It didn't absolutely ''prove'' anything (and "scientific proof' is an oxymoron anyway), but it did produce ''evidence'' against a naturalistic explanation.
 +
: Forgive me for being sceptical, but I don't give your claim that "his explanation actually didn't ignore anything that the bible said" much credibility when it is clear that your knowledge of the biblical account is somewhat lacking.  See the following comments.
 +
: As for Noah's flood, you wouldn't expect all the stories to be identical, as stories that are retold and retold verbally tend to change, often inadvertently, but sometimes deliberately (parents telling children using locations, creatures, etc. that they are familiar with rather than having to explain unfamiliar concepts).  But it's still the case that there is a lot of similarity; too much to explain other than with a common origin.  See [[Great Flood]] for more on this.  And everybody on Earth is descended from ''Noah'', not Moses.
 +
: The Bible records that after Cain killed Abel, they had another son, named Seth.  So there's three sons, not two.  Further, it also says that they had "other sons and daughters", so there's a lot more (Jewish tradition is two or three dozen of each, I believe), including potential wives for Cain.  (How did he have children?  The same way everyone else does:  The Bible says that "Cain lay with his wife, and she became pregnant".)  Now that may well raise another question in your mind, in which case I recommend that you read [http://creationontheweb.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter8.pdf this].
 +
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:15, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu