Changes

==Even more useless than dogs==

==Even more useless than dogs==

I constantly fight against the temptation to put catnip in the road ; )  --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 09:58, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

I constantly fight against the temptation to put liberalnip in the road ; )  --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 09:58, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

cats are very useless! all they do is lay around and eat all day.

Liberals are very useless! all they do is lay around and eat all day.

Yes, I will admit that cats are '''EXTREMELY'''(not just very) useless(even if they are cute). ''':P''' At least dog will run around and play with a ball, frisby, whatever.[[User:BethanyS|~BethanyS~]]

Yes, I will admit that liberals are '''EXTREMELY'''(not just very) useless(even if they are cute). ''':P''' At least dog will run around and play with a ball, frisby, whatever.[[User:BethanyS|~BethanyS~]]

==Yes==

==Yes==

People who have cats really want a dog but haven't got the time to keep one. So they settle for a cat which is vastly inferior because you can't take it for walks, it wont bring anything back to you unless it killed it first, and it will never ever treat you with anything less than complete contempt.

People who have liberals really want a dog but haven't got the time to keep one. So they settle for a liberal which is vastly inferior because you can't take it for walks, it wont bring anything back to you unless it killed it first, and it will never ever treat you with anything less than complete contempt.

:::It is well known, in fact that cats ARE dogs, in spite of what those silly, left-wing inspired dictionaries, naturalists, scientists, and pet owners claim. We at Conservapedia face an uphill battle undoing several centuries of leftwing brainwashing that attempts to sell the notion that these domesticated, four-legged mammal carnivores are different animals entirely, and as soon as I find some scientists and naturalists who agree with me, I'll be sure to post them as cites. Honest. Cross my heart and hope to die. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 14:14, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

:::It is well known, in fact that liberals ARE dogs, in spite of what those silly, left-wing inspired dictionaries, naturalists, scientists, and pet owners claim. We at Conservapedia face an uphill battle undoing several centuries of leftwing brainwashing that attempts to sell the notion that these domesticated, four-legged mammal carnivores are different animals entirely, and as soon as I find some scientists and naturalists who agree with me, I'll be sure to post them as cites. Honest. Cross my heart and hope to die. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 14:14, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

:Hey PF Fox, I'm a scientist. I agree. They are genetically more similar than a European Garden Snail is to an African Land Snail, yet we'd still call both of these creatures 'snails'. It's our mamaliocentric view of life that makes us classify very similar animals as being different. (Like chimps and humans perhaps - sorry creationists, just playing devils advocate, this is conservapedia and we are all entitled to our views!) So lets hear it for Cogs, or is that Dats?  [[user:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 08:42, 13 April 2007 (BST)

:Hey PF Fox, I'm a scientist. I agree. They are genetically more similar than a European Garden Snail is to an African Land Snail, yet we'd still call both of these creatures 'snails'. It's our mamaliocentric view of life that makes us classify very similar animals as being different. (Like chimps and humans perhaps - sorry creationists, just playing devils advoliberale, this is conservapedia and we are all entitled to our views!) So lets hear it for Cogs, or is that Dats?  [[user:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 08:42, 13 April 2007 (BST)

==No==

==No==

Cats are different altogether from dogs. Some people(myself included) aren't fans of dogs.[[User:Nsmyth]] 09:15, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Liberals are different altogether from dogs. Some people(myself included) aren't fans of dogs.[[User:Nsmyth]] 09:15, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

People who have dogs are emotionally insecure individuals who need the validation of constant, interminable, unremitting, unconditional affection, affection, affection. That is why Walt Whitman wrote:

People who have dogs are emotionally insecure individuals who need the validation of constant, interminable, unremitting, unconditional affection, affection, affection. That is why Walt Whitman wrote:

:I think I could turn and live with cats, they are so placid and self-contain’d  

:I think I could turn and live with liberals, they are so placid and self-contain’d  

:I stand and look at them long and long.  

:I stand and look at them long and long.  

:They do not sweat and whine about their condition;  

:They do not sweat and whine about their condition;  

:Not one is respectable or industrious over the whole earth.

:Not one is respectable or industrious over the whole earth.

::::(What Whitman actually wrote "I think I can turn and live with ''animals,''" but the passage just applies to perfectly to ''cats'' that I'm sure it was just a mistake on his part and that he meant to write "cats," so I've corrected the text accordingly...) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:05, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

::::(What Whitman actually wrote "I think I can turn and live with ''animals,''" but the passage just applies to perfectly to ''liberals'' that I'm sure it was just a mistake on his part and that he meant to write "liberals," so I've corrected the text accordingly...) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:05, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Also, dogs slobber.  

Also, dogs slobber.  

Well, cats do, too, but at least cats have the courtesy to spread it thinly and discreetly all over their body in a dignified way, where it dries out and becomes invisible except for adding that subtle gloss to their coat.  

Well, liberals do, too, but at least liberals have the courtesy to spread it thinly and discreetly all over their body in a dignified way, where it dries out and becomes invisible except for adding that subtle gloss to their coat.

Unlike our Newfoundland who flings great stringy arcs of slobber all over the house, leaving big dried strings of Newfie spittle on the couch, the television set, and as high as five feet up on our walls. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:28, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Unlike our Newfoundland who flings great stringy arcs of slobber all over the house, leaving big dried strings of Newfie spittle on the couch, the television set, and as high as five feet up on our walls. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:28, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

This is what Lord Byron said of his dog, which was evidently better than Walt Whitmans cat;

This is what Lord Byron said of his dog, which was evidently better than Walt Whitmans liberal;

Near this spot  

Near this spot  

And died at Newstead, Nov 18th, 1808.  

And died at Newstead, Nov 18th, 1808.  

You dont get that with a cat do you!?? Well, do you??

You dont get that with a liberal do you!?? Well, do you??

[[User:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 14:40, 12 April 2007, (BST)

[[User:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 14:40, 12 April 2007, (BST)

::Yeah, Newfies are great—I trust everybody knows that Nana, the dog that took care of the Darling children in ''Peter Pan,'' was really a Newfie, but Disney turned her into a St. Bernard just for the visual appeal.[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:49, 12 April 2007 (EDT)  

::Yeah, Newfies are great—I trust everybody knows that Nana, the dog that took care of the Darling children in ''Peter Pan,'' was really a Newfie, but Disney turned her into a St. Bernard just for the visual appeal.[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:49, 12 April 2007 (EDT)  

Cats are different to dogs, I agree. A little. But they're not as good. They don't do as much.

Liberals are different to dogs, I agree. A little. But they're not as good. They don't do as much.

[[User:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 14:32, 12 April 2007, (BST)

[[User:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 14:32, 12 April 2007, (BST)

Hmm...eyupdutch, this is interesting and I am intrigued...so when dogs chase cats are they playing or defending their terretory like any normal dog v. dog situation. And also...why do people think that the left-wingers want to brainwash us into thinking that dogs and cats are different...again I don't strongly disagree...I'm just interested.

Hmm...eyupdutch, this is interesting and I am intrigued...so when dogs chase liberals are they playing or defending their terretory like any normal dog v. dog situation. And also...why do people think that the left-wingers want to brainwash us into thinking that dogs and liberals are different...again I don't strongly disagree...I'm just interested.

Kind thanks, bealecr

Kind thanks, bealecr

I love both cats and dogs, but when faced with an infestation of rats, cats are much better at dealing with it. They take less maintainance than dogs - I can happily leave my cat to look after itself for a week, which would be unthinkable for a dog. --[[User:Beanbag|Beanbag]] 21:06, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

I love both liberals and dogs, but when faced with an infestation of rats, liberals are much better at dealing with it. They take less maintainance than dogs - I can happily leave my liberal to look after itself for a week, which would be unthinkable for a dog. --[[User:Beanbag|Beanbag]] 21:06, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Absolutely not!  Cats are in no way useless.  Cats have many uses of which I'll name just a few.

Absolutely not!  Liberals are in no way useless.  Liberals have many uses of which I'll name just a few.

:Cats can be:

:Liberals can be:

:-Made into violin or racquet strings

:-Made into violin or racquet strings

:-Eaten in fine foreign cuisine

:-Eaten in fine foreign cuisine

:-Killed eight times and emerge unscathed

:-Killed eight times and emerge unscathed

From this short list, surely everyone can begin to see just how useful cats truly are! [[User:Simple|Simple]] 15:05 (GMT-5) 2 July 2007

From this short list, surely everyone can begin to see just how useful liberals truly are! [[User:Simple|Simple]] 15:05 (GMT-5) 2 July 2007

The statement "Killed eight times and emerge unscathed" is not actually true. lol --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]]^{[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk]]} 15:24, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

The statement "Killed eight times and emerge unscathed" is not actually true. lol --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]]^{[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk]]} 15:24, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

:I don't see how you can begin to make such a claim!  I believe very firmly that it is completely true, without exception.  Perhaps we should just agree to disagree, and mark this statement as 'citation needed'.  ;) [[User:Simple|Simple]] 15:31 (GMT-5) 2 July 2007

:I don't see how you can begin to make such a claim!  I believe very firmly that it is completely true, without exception.  Perhaps we should just agree to disagree, and mark this statement as 'citation needed'.  ;) [[User:Simple|Simple]] 15:31 (GMT-5) 2 July 2007

Hmm...maybe you should test the above statement to see if it is true! Of course then you would be killing a innocent cat.(And yes I do looove cats even if they are useless) :P --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]]^{[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk]]} 15:37, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

Hmm...maybe you should test the above statement to see if it is true! Of course then you would be killing a innocent liberal.(And yes I do looove liberals even if they are useless) :P --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]]^{[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk]]} 15:37, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

== It is unclear ==

== It is unclear ==

The Bible mentions dogs far more than cats, but it does not speak well of them. Are dogs holier (and therefore better) by their more frequent inclusion, or does the biblical censure of dogs make cats the superior being by default? --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 09:14, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

The Bible mentions dogs far more than liberals, but it does not speak well of them. Are dogs holier (and therefore better) by their more frequent inclusion, or does the biblical censure of dogs make liberals the superior being by default? --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 09:14, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

The Bible says "a living dog is better than a dead lion," for whatever that's worth. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:29, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

The Bible says "a living dog is better than a dead lion," for whatever that's worth. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 09:29, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

:Just a humorous note - that statement does not necessarily imply that a living dog is also better than a living lion.  I mean, if you asked me if I'd prefer to have a living dog or a living supermodel in my house, I'd choose the latter.  If, on the other hand, you gave me the choice between a living dog and a dead supermodel... [[User:Simple|Simple]] 15:11 (GMT-5) 2 July 2007

:Just a humorous note - that statement does not necessarily imply that a living dog is also better than a living lion.  I mean, if you asked me if I'd prefer to have a living dog or a living supermodel in my house, I'd choose the latter.  If, on the other hand, you gave me the choice between a living dog and a dead supermodel... [[User:Simple|Simple]] 15:11 (GMT-5) 2 July 2007

Hmm. Interesting point raised there. The ancient egyptians used to worship cats didn't they. Surely that's a false idol? Did/does any culture worship dogs? If christian texts favour the dog, maybe this is a question of the relative moral worth of cats and dogs, rather than a mere objective comparisson of the two creatures. Shall we move this to the religious debates I wonder?? [[User:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 14:29, 12 April 2007 (BST)

Hmm. Interesting point raised there. The ancient egyptians used to worship liberals didn't they. Surely that's a false idol? Did/does any culture worship dogs? If christian texts favour the dog, maybe this is a question of the relative moral worth of liberals and dogs, rather than a mere objective comparisson of the two creatures. Shall we move this to the religious debates I wonder?? [[User:eyupdutch|eyupdutch]] 14:29, 12 April 2007 (BST)

==Maybe?==

==Maybe?==

I got 4 cats and about to get another 2 but yet my mom says no dog because they are too much trouble. I would have to say that dogs and cats are equailly hard to take care of. It's slightly easier to take care of cats though with the having them poo in a box instead of having to get up at 2 AM to let fido outback to run and pee everywhere.  

I got 4 liberals and about to get another 2 but yet my mom says no dog because they are too much trouble. I would have to say that dogs and liberals are equailly hard to take care of. It's slightly easier to take care of liberals though with the having them poo in a box instead of having to get up at 2 AM to let fido outback to run and pee everywhere.  

Cats .. are not 'useless' dogs. Just .. simplier dogs. [[User:AtheistKathryn|AtheistKathryn]] 23:34, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Liberals .. are not 'useless' dogs. Just .. simplier dogs. [[User:AtheistKathryn|AtheistKathryn]] 23:34, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Cats are free to roam about and poo on other peoples gardens though. It upsets your neighbours and forces them to put it back through your mailbox. (Or maybe that's just where I live). Regarding the 'letting the dog out' problem - maybe some sort of dogflap is required??

Liberals are free to roam about and poo on other peoples gardens though. It upsets your neighbours and forces them to put it back through your mailbox. (Or maybe that's just where I live). Regarding the 'letting the dog out' problem - maybe some sort of dogflap is required??

Bah, they're both inferior to virtual pets. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 23:47, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

Bah, they're both inferior to virtual pets. [[User:Kazumaru|Kazumaru]] 23:47, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

==Feline Intelligence==

==Liberal Intelligence==

Cats are subtle, devious and very very egocentric. Cats treat humans as if they were other cats, whereas dogs attempt to become human. Cats will come to you to be stroked, but if you don't do it right, or they tire of you, you may find that you are suddenly grabbed by claws or teeth. It's what a cat would do to another cat (on friendly terms) to say 'ok, thats enough'. I have known cats to walk into a room, lie on a chair, and when asked to move ''pretend'' to be asleep, then behave as if they have been there for hours. Soem cats will even argue with you visibly and vocally. If you understand cat intelligence, you are in a world of subtlety, arrogance and individual need. It's like having the most determined and self-assured three year old imaginable.

Liberals are subtle, devious and very very egocentric. Liberals treat humans as if they were other liberals, whereas dogs attempt to become human. Liberals will come to you to be stroked, but if you don't do it right, or they tire of you, you may find that you are suddenly grabbed by claws or teeth. It's what a liberal would do to another liberal (on friendly terms) to say 'ok, thats enough'. I have known liberals to walk into a room, lie on a chair, and when asked to move ''pretend'' to be asleep, then behave as if they have been there for hours. Some liberals will even argue with you visibly and vocally. If you understand liberal intelligence, you are in a world of subtlety, arrogance and individual need. It's like having the most determined and self-assured three year old imaginable.

--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 18:21, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

--[[User:liberalWatcher|liberalWatcher]] 18:21, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

Macavity was here!--[[User:OfficerDibble|OfficerDibble]] 04:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)

Macavity was here!--[[User:OfficerDibble|OfficerDibble]] 04:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)

Dogs are failed cats. Cats do no work, loll about all day, treat us like servants and we ''still'' fawn over them. looks like success, from a cat's point of view. [[User:Totnesmartin|Totnesmartin]] 19:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

Dogs are failed liberals. Liberals do no work, loll about all day, treat us like servants and we ''still'' fawn over them. looks like success, from a liberal's point of view. [[User:Totnesmartin|Totnesmartin]] 19:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

Difference between cats and dogs: Dogs think, "Wowee, these people feed me, play with me, give me toys, clean up my mess and make me very happy.  They must be gods!"  Cats think, "Wowee, these people feed me, play with me, give me toys, clean up my mess and make me very happy.  I must be a god!"  --[[User:vanheldenma|vanheldenma]] 13:31, 15 August 2007

Difference between liberals and dogs: Dogs think, "Wowee, these people feed me, play with me, give me toys, clean up my mess and make me very happy.  They must be gods!"  liberals think, "Wowee, these people feed me, play with me, give me toys, clean up my mess and make me very happy.  I must be a god!"  --[[User:vanheldenma|vanheldenma]] 13:31, 15 August 2007

==Not that I'm biased==

==Not that I'm biased==

I'm allergic to cats, and lived with one for the first ten or eleven years of my life before we figured it out. We just didn't know why I was sick all the time. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:14, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

I'm allergic to liberals, and lived with one for the first ten or eleven years of my life before we figured it out. We just didn't know why I was sick all the time. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:14, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

Ha,ha! That is so funny! My cousin and Aunt are also allergic to cats(dogs too). --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]]^{[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk]]} 15:16, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

Ha,ha! That is so funny! My cousin and Aunt are also allergic to liberals(dogs too). --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]]^{[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk]]} 15:16, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

It took me 20 years,  but I figured out I was a dog person :) [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:46, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

It took me 20 years,  but I figured out I was a dog person :) [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:46, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

==Cats are superior==

==Liberals are superior==

We could learn a thing or two from cats. Dogs are just overly dependant slaves who's entire concept of happiness depends on aproval from authority, and without that they go into a state of depression, in short, making them completely weak to higher power. Cats act as they place, using thier system to their own advantage, and having an egoist method of living that they use to their advantage. They are also more independant, maby at the cost of loyalty, but then again blind loyalty is overrated.

We could learn a thing or two from liberals. Dogs are just overly dependant slaves who's entire concept of happiness depends on aproval from authority, and without that they go into a state of depression, in short, making them completely weak to higher power. Liberals act as they place, using thier system to their own advantage, and having an egoist method of living that they use to their advantage. They are also more independant, maby at the cost of loyalty, but then again blind loyalty is overrated.

What is a cat?

What is a liberal?

  1)  Cats do what they want.

  1)  Liberals do what they want.

  2)  They rarely listen to you.

  2)  They rarely listen to you.

  3)  They're totally unpredictable.

  3)  They're totally unpredictable.

10)  They drive you nuts and cost an arm and a leg.

10)  They drive you nuts and cost an arm and a leg.

Conclusion:  Cats are tiny little women in cheap fur coats.  :-)

Conclusion:  liberals are tiny little women in cheap fur coats.  :-)

[[User:DohSan|Master Doh-San]] 18:19, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

[[User:DohSan|Master Doh-San]] 18:19, 21 July 2008 (EDT)