Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 266:
Line 266: + +
→Reversion
::::But aren't we having this conversation because you actually don't allow unflattering remarks about Republicans? The quantity of my contributions shouldn't matter - we're talking about factually correct information that is being kept out of our encyclopedia for reasons that really don't make any sense. --[[User:JonPdh|JonPdh]] 12:17, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
::::But aren't we having this conversation because you actually don't allow unflattering remarks about Republicans? The quantity of my contributions shouldn't matter - we're talking about factually correct information that is being kept out of our encyclopedia for reasons that really don't make any sense. --[[User:JonPdh|JonPdh]] 12:17, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
::::I guess you haven't been here long enough. Here is a page created a flaming liberal about a Republican, [[Buz_Lukens]]. Tell me if this is flattering. Like I said before, take your beef with the administrator if you don't like the results. Not everything a liberal wants, they get. You can find all glorified liberals and all slandered conservatives on Wikipedia's website. Might be best for you.-- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:43, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
==what's the deal?==
==what's the deal?==
Why is our discussion of McCain framed completely by Obama's actions? The two are not inherently linked in any significant way - they are just two people trying to get the same job. --[[User:JonPdh|JonPdh]] 12:00, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Why is our discussion of McCain framed completely by Obama's actions? The two are not inherently linked in any significant way - they are just two people trying to get the same job. --[[User:JonPdh|JonPdh]] 12:00, 2 October 2008 (EDT)