nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − − == Basic Grammar Changes == − − I found that there were several grammatical errors in the page and thought I'd run through them: − − 1. 1st sentence of the Creationism and Intelligent Design section has a double "the" in the phrase "believe that the the natural world." <br /> − 2. 2nd sentence of the same section reads "Recently, there has been," and may be an effort by liberals to make Conservapedia sound like lolcats.<br /> − 3. 5th sentence of the same section has a double "of" in the phrase "advocates of of creationism," which may stem from liberals' misuse of prepositions in trying to sabotage this article. − − Hope this helps!--[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 14:24, 3 October 2008 (EDT) Line 352:
Line 342: + + + + + + + + + + + +
New topics to at the end, but thanks
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
== Added material about Dover Trial ==
== Added material about Dover Trial ==
I would like to include mention of [[Cdesign proponentsists]] in the paragraph about the Dover case as an argument linking creationism and ID. I can not edit the page to do this, so will someone with authority please review and include it. --[[User:Gman2|Gman2]] 18:06, 4 February 2008 (EST)
I would like to include mention of [[Cdesign proponentsists]] in the paragraph about the Dover case as an argument linking creationism and ID. I can not edit the page to do this, so will someone with authority please review and include it. --[[User:Gman2|Gman2]] 18:06, 4 February 2008 (EST)
: I've unlocked the article, but I don't think that the term deserves mention in the article. It's little more than irrelevant trivia. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:00, 4 February 2008 (EST)
: I've unlocked the article, but I don't think that the term deserves mention in the article. It's little more than irrelevant trivia. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:00, 4 February 2008 (EST)
== Basic Grammar Changes ==
I found that there were several grammatical errors in the page and thought I'd run through them:
1. 1st sentence of the Creationism and Intelligent Design section has a double "the" in the phrase "believe that the the natural world." <br />
2. 2nd sentence of the same section reads "Recently, there has been," and may be an effort by liberals to make Conservapedia sound like lolcats.<br />
3. 5th sentence of the same section has a double "of" in the phrase "advocates of of creationism," which may stem from liberals' misuse of prepositions in trying to sabotage this article.
Hope this helps!--[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 14:24, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
: Thanks; I've fixed each of them. Without checking the history, though, I suspect just simple typos rather than "liberal" sabotage. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:29, 3 October 2008 (EDT)