Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
now moved to mainspace
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''NOTE:''' ''This article is currently under construction and being researched. Any suggestions for further examples or helpful criticism would be appreciated on the appropriate [[User_talk:Foxtrot/Homosexuality_and_Language |talk page]].''
+
'''NOTE:''' ''This article now appears in the mainspace as [[Homosexuality and language]].''
−
 
      +
---
 
Like many [[liberal]] organizations and the entire [[politically correct]] imposition, [[homosexual]]s have developed their own '''homosexual language''' as a [[linguistic]] and [[rhetoric]]al device to further the [[homosexual agenda]]. As John Honey aptly outlined in his book ''"Language is Power"''<ref>'''Language is Power: The Story of Standard English and its Enemies''' by John Honey, Faber
 
Like many [[liberal]] organizations and the entire [[politically correct]] imposition, [[homosexual]]s have developed their own '''homosexual language''' as a [[linguistic]] and [[rhetoric]]al device to further the [[homosexual agenda]]. As John Honey aptly outlined in his book ''"Language is Power"''<ref>'''Language is Power: The Story of Standard English and its Enemies''' by John Honey, Faber
 
and Faber, London 1997</ref><ref>[http://www.geocities.com/christopherrollason/Honey2001.pdf Cached version of Christopher Rollason's review]</ref>, controlling the language allows one to implicitly control the perceptions of yourself. By changing the words used to describe homosexuals, they have surreptitiously tried to soften the public's view of them and undermine their critics as insensitive, draconian, and repressive.
 
and Faber, London 1997</ref><ref>[http://www.geocities.com/christopherrollason/Honey2001.pdf Cached version of Christopher Rollason's review]</ref>, controlling the language allows one to implicitly control the perceptions of yourself. By changing the words used to describe homosexuals, they have surreptitiously tried to soften the public's view of them and undermine their critics as insensitive, draconian, and repressive.
4,781

edits

Navigation menu