Changes

There appears to be some bias present in this article, as well as a preponderance of criticisms. Some more balance might be achieved by removing the biased language in the chapter analysis, and adding some positive reviews to balance out the criticisms. --[[User:Diagoras|Diagoras]] 23:04, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

There appears to be some bias present in this article, as well as a preponderance of criticisms. Some more balance might be achieved by removing the biased language in the chapter analysis, and adding some positive reviews to balance out the criticisms. --[[User:Diagoras|Diagoras]] 23:04, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

: The page is not locked, so you are able to improve it yourself.  Or, if you don't feel comfortable doing that, propose some ''specific'' changes here for discussion.  Personally, though, I don't see too much wrong with it.  Don't forget that whether or not you consider it biased depends to a fair extent on your own bias.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:23, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

: The page is not locked, so you are able to improve it yourself.  Or, if you don't feel comfortable doing that, propose some ''specific'' changes here for discussion.  Personally, though, I don't see too much wrong with it.  Don't forget that whether or not you consider it biased depends to a fair extent on your own bias.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:23, 2 October 2008 (EDT)