Changes

One of the arguments proponents of teaching ID in schools like is: "Children should be able to hear both sides, and make their own mind up". So why not do the same here? Have the dinosaur article link to two sub articles:  

One of the arguments proponents of teaching ID in schools like is: "Children should be able to hear both sides, and make their own mind up". So why not do the same here? Have the dinosaur article link to two sub articles:  

:1. Dinosaur origins according to Young Earth Creationists.

#Dinosaur origins according to Young Earth Creationists.

:2. Dinosaur origins according to non Young Earth Creationists.

#Dinosaur origins according to non Young Earth Creationists.

And let each side do what they like with their respective articles. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 20:23, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

And let each side do what they like with their respective articles. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 20:23, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

 

: Why only those two? What makes those two so special? Why don't you present the Native American or Ancient Greek or Hindu approaches to the creation of the world and how they each account for dinosaurs. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 20:29, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

I reject equal time for faith-based opinions in a science classroom, and thankfully, the law's on my side.  But here, since that's the Wiki's stated goal, I think that's a fine compromise. I think having the YEC point first is fine too. I don't think having disqualifiers or terms like "evolutionists," though, is okay.  Perhaps a preface statement saying, "these are the findings of mainstream scientists."-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:25, 20 March 2007 (EDT)