Changes

:Tiresome logic, it is Conservapedia against the world. CP can do no right ever.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''^{[[User:Jpatt|  ]]} 09:56, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

:Tiresome logic, it is Conservapedia against the world. CP can do no right ever.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''^{[[User:Jpatt|  ]]} 09:56, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

:Jpatt, it's not about "CP against the world", it's about getting the facts right and being trustworthy.  This is a conservative encyclopedia, not a neutral one, so people like me aren't looking to invalidate the conservative POV, we're trying to improve the credibility of the site constructively.  I'm also a firm believer that the conservative POV has a lot more credibility when it doesn't rely on double-standards to make it seem like some things don't go one with conservatives as well as liberals.  (McCain has repudiated and disconnected himself with people like Hagee and Keating, and we accept that by no longer associating them in the current sense.  Why can't we show the character the conservative POV is supposed to represent by extending the same consideration to Obama when he repudiates Wright or the past actions of Ayers?  My grandfather told me that I'd never regret taking the high road no matter how tempting or even acceptable it might be to do otherwise, and his advice has served me well for over 40 years.   

::Jpatt, it's not about "CP against the world", it's about getting the facts right and being trustworthy.  This is a conservative encyclopedia, not a neutral one, so people like me aren't looking to invalidate the conservative POV, we're trying to improve the credibility of the site constructively.  I'm also a firm believer that the conservative POV has a lot more credibility when it doesn't rely on double-standards to make it seem like some things don't go one with conservatives as well as liberals.  (McCain has repudiated and disconnected himself with people like Hagee and Keating, and we accept that by no longer associating them in the current sense.  Why can't we show the character the conservative POV is supposed to represent by extending the same consideration to Obama when he repudiates Wright or the past actions of Ayers?  My grandfather told me that I'd never regret taking the high road no matter how tempting or even acceptable it might be to do otherwise, and his advice has served me well for over 40 years.   

:I'd suggest that more people on CP try to edit with the undecided reader in mind, not the true-believers who don't need more convincing.  Being fair, being respectful, and sticking to facts with credible sources instead of posting speculation and expecting others to find the supporting evidence is going to win a lot more people over to the conservative POV than the approaches used in too many articles here. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:57, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

::I'd suggest that more people on CP try to edit with the undecided reader in mind, not the true-believers who don't need more convincing.  Being fair, being respectful, and sticking to facts with credible sources instead of posting speculation and expecting others to find the supporting evidence is going to win a lot more people over to the conservative POV than the approaches used in too many articles here. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:57, 7 October 2008 (EDT)