1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 71:
Line 71: + + +
→Christianity and evolution
On a more technical level, the "Many [...] have been known to be atheists" is VERY relative once you look a little beyond the US borders and treat "hold to the theory of evolution" as "thinks that it's the best explanation right now". Creationism isn't exactly a majority view outside the US (Christian Creationism even less), but tons of people outside the US are Christians. Yes, it's not WRONG (since still "many" are atheists), but it's quite misleading. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:58, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
On a more technical level, the "Many [...] have been known to be atheists" is VERY relative once you look a little beyond the US borders and treat "hold to the theory of evolution" as "thinks that it's the best explanation right now". Creationism isn't exactly a majority view outside the US (Christian Creationism even less), but tons of people outside the US are Christians. Yes, it's not WRONG (since still "many" are atheists), but it's quite misleading. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:58, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
==CreationWiki==
This "article" is getting better, but I still have to scorn citations to CreationWiki :-P -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 21:46, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
This "article" is getting better, but I still have to scorn citations to CreationWiki :-P -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 21:46, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
:I actually only have one real reference to them, the rest are just external links. I also have EvoWiki in there now. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 21:51, 20 March 2007 (EDT)