4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count? (view source)
Revision as of 02:33, March 21, 2007
, 02:33, March 21, 2007no edit summary
'''Resolution:''' That's a great idea, Tim! Go ahead and make that change. There might be a way to improve on "term lists," such as "study key term lists" or some other more descriptive phrase. Perhaps even a link to explain it!! You can decide whether such a link should itself count as an entry! --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:42, 6 January 2007 (EST)
'''Resolution:''' That's a great idea, Tim! Go ahead and make that change. There might be a way to improve on "term lists," such as "study key term lists" or some other more descriptive phrase. Perhaps even a link to explain it!! You can decide whether such a link should itself count as an entry! --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:42, 6 January 2007 (EST)
------
>>This debate hardly seems worth the time it takes.
If I see this aright, it is whether lists count as content?
Yes. Lists can be very valuable and worthwhile and worthy as content.
I can list the versions of the ten commandments and find it very instructive.
I can list the names of areas of thought and that can be very instructive and useful to someone hoping to find the best of thinking of humanity.
Or a list of math topics needed for a graduate in physics - very needy if I'm at home wondering whether I have covered all things considered needful.
Bibliographies, keyword lists, glossaries - all can be very helpful. An index in a book can be something to be thankful for.