Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:     
isn't it anti-conservapedia to have pictures of human fossils in articles, since it relates to evolution and whatnot? and what is the relevance of a skull in an artile about china? -Sundance
 
isn't it anti-conservapedia to have pictures of human fossils in articles, since it relates to evolution and whatnot? and what is the relevance of a skull in an artile about china? -Sundance
 +
 +
== Number of Muslims? ==
 +
 +
If anyone has a citation for the number of Muslims in China, then a reliable, ''cited'' estimate of that number would be welcome. But not ''without'' a citation.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 19:52, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
12,071

edits

Navigation menu