1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46:
Line 46: + + + +
Debate: Should certain books be banned from libraries? (view source)
Revision as of 04:26, October 10, 2008
, 04:26, October 10, 2008no edit summary
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
==Yes!==
Censorship indeed takes away someone's access to information, but as long as the side that's left is the side that's good, then it should definitely be enacted, even if only to prevent children from getting at evil books like The Catcher in The Rye, and LaVey's Satanic Bible. Censorship limits thought, but if you take that stance, then prosecuting criminals limits their freedoms. Censorship should be used as a proactive criminal justice system, taking the ideas of Naked Lunch and others like it out of people's heads for good. -[[user:Honomo|Honomo]] 21:27, 9 October 2008