Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
:Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias! {{unsigned|Smile}}
 
:Yes we should use it! And of course it is biased - it has a conservative Christian bias! {{unsigned|Smile}}
 +
::Andy has yet to admit that the site is biased.  He's still pretending it's neutral.  Until he does otherwise, we should keep the "dream" alive.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:06, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
    
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
 
== Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views ==
    
Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views?  Is the article correct?  There is no citation. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
 
Does AIG want removal of evo material from schools or present both views?  Is the article correct?  There is no citation. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
 +
: Only Genesis.  No evil-ution.  They're that nuts.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:06, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits

Navigation menu