768
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 2:
Line 2: + − + − +
Debate:Was the media attention needed? (view source)
Revision as of 03:26, March 21, 2007
, 03:26, March 21, 2007corrected spelling
== It was needed to spread the gospel of Conservapedia ==
== It was needed to spread the gospel of Conservapedia ==
I'm sorry... the what? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
== The attention was needed ==
== The attention was needed ==
== It should of only been mentioned, not covered ==
== It should have only been mentioned, not covered ==
== No, but if it was not for it, I would not be here ==
== No, but if it was not for it, I would not be here ==
== Conservapedia shouldn't of had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages ==
== Conservapedia shouldn't have had any media coverage for the sake of protecting pages ==