1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + +
Debate:Was the media attention needed? (view source)
Revision as of 03:30, March 21, 2007
, 03:30, March 21, 2007no edit summary
I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
I discovered Conservapedia from the media but it has also seems to have attracted unwanted attention. Do you think we really needed all that coverage? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 23:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
== It was needed to spread the word of an alternative to Wikipedia ==
== It was needed to spread the gospel of Conservapedia ==
I'm sorry... the what? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
I'm sorry... the what? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
: I think it just made YEC viewpoints get mocked further. Look at the articles, who could blame them. --[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
: I think it just made YEC viewpoints get mocked further. Look at the articles, who could blame them. --[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
::The word that Gospel is from in the greek can mean "good news" as well, so it's not necessarily a bible thing :-). "It was needed to spread the ''good news'' of Conservapedia" --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 23:30, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
== The attention was needed ==
== The attention was needed ==