Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
745 bytes added ,  04:52, March 21, 2007
Line 113: Line 113:     
:::So Eljoe made a good point anyway... the source was from the Giuliani campaign.  Note that the Union supports Democratic candidates, which it does, and leave the analysis portion out of it.  And '''unlock the article.''' Just because people disagree with you is not a good reason to protect an article.[[User:Myk|Myk]] 00:49, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::So Eljoe made a good point anyway... the source was from the Giuliani campaign.  Note that the Union supports Democratic candidates, which it does, and leave the analysis portion out of it.  And '''unlock the article.''' Just because people disagree with you is not a good reason to protect an article.[[User:Myk|Myk]] 00:49, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*'''Since the Union has a clear record of endorsing Democratic Party candidates, and in this case, endorsing Kerry way before he had locked up the primaries, their prior actions do indeed go to a pre-disposed bias, no? And it was quoted in Bloomberg as Rudy's response to the Union's open letter, therefore it is part of the record.  Showing only the Union's charges, without allowing the other side's response, isn't fair, it isn't balanced.    My IM is listed in the box of my talk page, feel free to use it.  Until all the constant reverts, and removing of partial quotes ends, either someone is being suspended, or it will stay locked for tonight.''' --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 00:52, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu