Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
290 bytes added ,  05:02, March 21, 2007
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:     
I think it should be kept. There is already a precedent for articles about games in [[Dungeons and Dragons]]. And also I think for a while there was a bit of a fundyfuss about Pokemon being satanic or something which might be of interest to Conservapedia readers. [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 01:00, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I think it should be kept. There is already a precedent for articles about games in [[Dungeons and Dragons]]. And also I think for a while there was a bit of a fundyfuss about Pokemon being satanic or something which might be of interest to Conservapedia readers. [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 01:00, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Well, I think that someone should at least turn it into a viable article instead of this stupidity. I'm probably going to blank this in a second until I can find enough info about pokemon to make it into a good(or at least an "ok")article.[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]] 01:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
351

edits

Navigation menu