nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW
461
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 123:
Line 123: + + +
Talk:Scientific method (view source)
Revision as of 13:11, October 15, 2008
, 13:11, October 15, 2008→Distinct from Scientific theory
Maybe we need to look at Popper on scientific method. He's the set text for many university philosophy of science papers --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 23:07, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
Maybe we need to look at Popper on scientific method. He's the set text for many university philosophy of science papers --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 23:07, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
==Use of Theory==
The way the current article is written a single tested hypothesis would be classified as a theory. This is incorrect. I will think of some wording that would convey that a theory is a conjecture derived from multiple tested hypotheses.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 09:11, 15 October 2008 (EDT)