Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
graded
Line 4: Line 4:     
(b) He welcomed immigrants into the United States.
 
(b) He welcomed immigrants into the United States.
 +
 +
: Correct.
    
2. Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.
 
2. Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.
Line 9: Line 11:  
They were anti-slavery.  
 
They were anti-slavery.  
 
They did not want to annex Texas.
 
They did not want to annex Texas.
 +
 +
: No, not entirely anti-slavery.  Whigs merely tended to be more anti-slavery than Democrats.  There are better examples to give, like favoring a national bank.  (Minus 1).
    
3. What caused and what ended the Mexican War?
 
3. What caused and what ended the Mexican War?
Line 15: Line 19:     
Nicholas Trist signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on Feb 2, 1848, ending the Mexican War. The treaty gave Texas to the United States, and established the Mexico-Texas border as the Rio Grande, also adding California, Utah, and Nevada to the U.S., along with parts of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming.
 
Nicholas Trist signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on Feb 2, 1848, ending the Mexican War. The treaty gave Texas to the United States, and established the Mexico-Texas border as the Rio Grande, also adding California, Utah, and Nevada to the U.S., along with parts of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming.
 +
 +
:Excellent.
    
4. Who do you think was the most important person in the period 1840-1860, and why?
 
4. Who do you think was the most important person in the period 1840-1860, and why?
    
Harriet Beacher Stowe was the most important person between the years of 1840-60, because her book ''Uncle Tom's Cabin'' brought to life the hardship of the life of a slave, while most people had been ignorant of it until then.
 
Harriet Beacher Stowe was the most important person between the years of 1840-60, because her book ''Uncle Tom's Cabin'' brought to life the hardship of the life of a slave, while most people had been ignorant of it until then.
 +
 +
:Terrific answer!
    
5. Explain what "Bleeding Kansas" was.
 
5. Explain what "Bleeding Kansas" was.
    
"Bleeding Kansas" was the term used to describe the large amount of bloodshed that went on in Kansas when a civil war broke out between pro- and anti-slave groups.
 
"Bleeding Kansas" was the term used to describe the large amount of bloodshed that went on in Kansas when a civil war broke out between pro- and anti-slave groups.
 +
 +
:Correct.
    
6. Explain the cartoon, and what you think the cartoonist's view was. The woman's quote begins, "You have been a bad boy, Steve, ever since you had anything to do with that Nebraska Bill ...."
 
6. Explain the cartoon, and what you think the cartoonist's view was. The woman's quote begins, "You have been a bad boy, Steve, ever since you had anything to do with that Nebraska Bill ...."
    
The cartoon shows Columbia spanking Stephen Douglas, with Uncle Sam watching, obviously approving, showing that the artist was not happy Douglas, or the Nebraska Bill.
 
The cartoon shows Columbia spanking Stephen Douglas, with Uncle Sam watching, obviously approving, showing that the artist was not happy Douglas, or the Nebraska Bill.
 +
 +
: Good ... but why is the artist not happy WITH Douglas?  (Minus 1).
    
7. Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War? Explain.
 
7. Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War? Explain.
    
No. Even if it had been avoided at that particular time in history, eventually the North and South would have fought. They had many disagreements, such as slavery and tariffs.
 
No. Even if it had been avoided at that particular time in history, eventually the North and South would have fought. They had many disagreements, such as slavery and tariffs.
 +
 +
: Superb.
    
[edit] Honors Questions
 
[edit] Honors Questions
Line 41: Line 55:     
It might have been possible for the South to fight enough to secede, but not quite to win entirely. For a nation growing as large as the U.S., it is improbable that even at that time, such a big chunk of it would be lost.
 
It might have been possible for the South to fight enough to secede, but not quite to win entirely. For a nation growing as large as the U.S., it is improbable that even at that time, such a big chunk of it would be lost.
 +
 +
:OK.
    
H2. Explain the Compromise of 1850.
 
H2. Explain the Compromise of 1850.
Line 51: Line 67:  
     * enacted tougher federal fugitive slave laws and strictly enforced them (Clay pushed this through the Senate)
 
     * enacted tougher federal fugitive slave laws and strictly enforced them (Clay pushed this through the Senate)
 
     * Texas received $10M to pay off its debt in return for accepting a narrower western boundary and give up claims to New Mexico and territory that became other states  
 
     * Texas received $10M to pay off its debt in return for accepting a narrower western boundary and give up claims to New Mexico and territory that became other states  
 +
 +
: Good.
    
H4. Do you think John Brown helped his cause?
 
H4. Do you think John Brown helped his cause?
    
No. He made the anti-slavery activists look like violent people.
 
No. He made the anti-slavery activists look like violent people.
 +
 +
: Well stated!
 +
 +
: Good work.  Score: 98/100.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:13, 17 October 2008 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu