Changes

:::This is hardly an isolated incident.  His fairly recent description of several editors, including myself, as "dogs" and "maggots", rather than entering into any reasonable discussion with us, springs to mind.  This does not strike me as "playful banter".  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 12:55, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

:::This is hardly an isolated incident.  His fairly recent description of several editors, including myself, as "dogs" and "maggots", rather than entering into any reasonable discussion with us, springs to mind.  This does not strike me as "playful banter".  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 12:55, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

::::Sideways, please be truthful. Those epithets were attached to saboteurs from another site. If, of course, you are one, then own up. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:57, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

::::Sideways, please be truthful. Those epithets were attached to saboteurs from another site. If, of course, you are one, then own up. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:57, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

:::::On the contrary, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ABig_Science&diff=519823&oldid=519763 this comment] of yours made no mention of saboteurs or another website, and appears to be addressed to everybody who had commented on the [[Big Science]] talk page, calling them such names as "dogs" and "fellow travelers to the cesspit" and describing their opinions as "drivel".  Perhaps in future you might exercise some [[courtesy]] towards other editors, even if you do not agree with their opinions.  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 13:13, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

:::::On the contrary, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ABig_Science&diff=519823&oldid=519763 this comment] of yours made no mention of saboteurs or another website, and appears to be addressed to everybody who had commented on the [[Essay:Big science|Big Science]] talk page, calling them such names as "dogs" and "fellow travelers to the cesspit" and describing their opinions as "drivel".  Perhaps in future you might exercise some [[courtesy]] towards other editors, even if you do not agree with their opinions.  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 13:13, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

::::::I have no interest in extending the finer points of etiquette to those who are inspired by atheistic and liberal outside bodies to subvert and attempt to destroy this project. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:16, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

::::::I have no interest in extending the finer points of etiquette to those who are inspired by atheistic and liberal outside bodies to subvert and attempt to destroy this project. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:16, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

I had recently mentioned my disappointment with this site about a week ago maybe, Bugler's derogatory comments didn't help. If this site is trying to become a reliable, family-friendly, online encyclopedia, then I suggest that you, Bugler, quit being backed by your anti-Australian, hate-liberal views. There is no reason to be so derogatory towards people who have different opinions then you. If an editor on Wikipedia said what you said, but towards conservatives, they would be kicked out. [[User:JSJames|JSJames]] 12:37 pm (PT) 28 September 2008

I had recently mentioned my disappointment with this site about a week ago maybe, Bugler's derogatory comments didn't help. If this site is trying to become a reliable, family-friendly, online encyclopedia, then I suggest that you, Bugler, quit being backed by your anti-Australian, hate-liberal views. There is no reason to be so derogatory towards people who have different opinions then you. If an editor on Wikipedia said what you said, but towards conservatives, they would be kicked out. [[User:JSJames|JSJames]] 12:37 pm (PT) 28 September 2008