nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
Talk:Scientific establishment (view source)
Revision as of 13:20, October 18, 2008
, 13:20, October 18, 2008→Link to essay: What's wrong with putting it in this article?
I don't believe that it's appropriate for an ''article'' to link to an ''essay'', especially where the link is merely on an alternative term for the article that it's in (i.e. ''big science'' is a term for ''scientific establishment'', so why have a link in the ''scientific establishment'' article to elsewhere?). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:08, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
I don't believe that it's appropriate for an ''article'' to link to an ''essay'', especially where the link is merely on an alternative term for the article that it's in (i.e. ''big science'' is a term for ''scientific establishment'', so why have a link in the ''scientific establishment'' article to elsewhere?). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:08, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
:The essay explains and exposes the lies and distortions of Big Science. Such insight is important to students seeking to make sense of the 'scientific establishment'. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 09:12, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
:The essay explains and exposes the lies and distortions of Big Science. Such insight is important to students seeking to make sense of the 'scientific establishment'. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 09:12, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
:: But that information, if factual, should go in this article, making a link to an essay unneccesary. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:20, 18 October 2008 (EDT)