Changes

:*Disagree.  It's coverage of the topic is too limited, briefly describing different architectural styles, but nothing more.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:16, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

:*Disagree.  It's coverage of the topic is too limited, briefly describing different architectural styles, but nothing more.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:16, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

:* Agree. It has been improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 20:33, 16 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Agree. It has been improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 20:33, 16 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Still disagree, but... It still covers almost nothing except architectural styles.  The description of architecture itself is limited to the first two sentences plus a further sentence quoting a dictionary definition.  There's nothing about the goals of architecture, the methods that architects use, the profession of architecture, etc.  If this article was moved to [[Architectural styles]], ''then'' perhaps it would be good enough to qualify.  But for its current title, its coverage is still far too limited.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:49, 17 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Still disagree, but... It still covers almost nothing except architectural styles.  The description of architecture itself is limited to the first two sentences plus a further sentence quoting a dictionary definition.  There's nothing about the goals of architecture, the methods that architects use, the profession of architecture, etc.  If this article was moved to [[Architectural styles]], ''then'' perhaps it would be good enough to qualify.  But for its current title, its coverage is still far too limited.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:49, 17 October 2008 (EDT) Done. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 11:02, 18 October 2008 (EDT)

}}

}}

{{fa|Great Flood|

{{fa|Great Flood|