Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:  
::What if we linked it as a see also? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:31, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::What if we linked it as a see also? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:31, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::: On the one hand, I still don't think that's appropriate for an encyclopaedia, but on the other hand, given that Conservapedia is not a typical encyclopaedia (e.g. having essays and debates, even the collaborative nature of the Wiki is not typical of traditional encyclopaedias, though normal in Wiki ones), perhaps that's not a bad suggestion.  This would set a bit of a precedent, so I'll go along with that if there is further support and no or minimal opposition.  I assume that in the "see also" section it will be apparent that it is an essay being linked to.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:55, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::: On the one hand, I still don't think that's appropriate for an encyclopaedia, but on the other hand, given that Conservapedia is not a typical encyclopaedia (e.g. having essays and debates, even the collaborative nature of the Wiki is not typical of traditional encyclopaedias, though normal in Wiki ones), perhaps that's not a bad suggestion.  This would set a bit of a precedent, so I'll go along with that if there is further support and no or minimal opposition.  I assume that in the "see also" section it will be apparent that it is an essay being linked to.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:55, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
::::I believe the precedent has been set elsewhere, which is why I advocated it. I'd rather ''not'' set the precedent of adding essays to articles, if it's not already happening. I can't think of any examples off the top of my head, I'll poke around and see if I can find one. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:57, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
5,580

edits

Navigation menu