Changes

:*Disagree. I'm not qualified to judge it's accuracy, but it is too obscure and not written at a suitable level.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:24, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

:*Disagree. I'm not qualified to judge it's accuracy, but it is too obscure and not written at a suitable level.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:24, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

:*Disagree. Not long enough, too many red links, not nearly enough images that explain the text, I just didn't understand what was going on in that article. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 21:31, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

:*Disagree. Not long enough, too many red links, not nearly enough images that explain the text, I just didn't understand what was going on in that article. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 21:31, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

}}

}}

:*Disagree, too short, far too many red links [[User:JY23|JY23]] 18:31, 17 September 2008 (EDT)

:*Disagree, too short, far too many red links [[User:JY23|JY23]] 18:31, 17 September 2008 (EDT)

:*Neutral.  Would like to see what it looks like after more information added; it could be a good article. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:02, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

:*Neutral.  Would like to see what it looks like after more information added; it could be a good article. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:02, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

}}

}}

:* Agree. It has been improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 20:33, 16 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Agree. It has been improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 20:33, 16 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Still disagree, but... It still covers almost nothing except architectural styles.  The description of architecture itself is limited to the first two sentences plus a further sentence quoting a dictionary definition.  There's nothing about the goals of architecture, the methods that architects use, the profession of architecture, etc.  If this article was moved to [[Architectural styles]], ''then'' perhaps it would be good enough to qualify.  But for its current title, its coverage is still far too limited.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:49, 17 October 2008 (EDT) Done. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 11:02, 18 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Still disagree, but... It still covers almost nothing except architectural styles.  The description of architecture itself is limited to the first two sentences plus a further sentence quoting a dictionary definition.  There's nothing about the goals of architecture, the methods that architects use, the profession of architecture, etc.  If this article was moved to [[Architectural styles]], ''then'' perhaps it would be good enough to qualify.  But for its current title, its coverage is still far too limited.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:49, 17 October 2008 (EDT) Done. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 11:02, 18 October 2008 (EDT)

}}

}}

{{fa|Great Flood|

{{fa|Great Flood|

:* Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 21:30, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 21:30, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Agree.  But it would be nice to finish the missing sections. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

:* Agree.  But it would be nice to finish the missing sections. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

}}

}}

{{fa|Kosher|

{{fa|Kosher|