4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
reason to not delete
::I quite agree. And even if one can swallow its moral unwholesomeness, it deserves to be deleted for its use of 'lit crit' jargon. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:20, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
::I quite agree. And even if one can swallow its moral unwholesomeness, it deserves to be deleted for its use of 'lit crit' jargon. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:20, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
:::Au contraire, Bugler. It is not a reason to delete the article, but rather a reason to keep the article as another example of professor values and the homosexual agenda at work. I've rewritten it to take out most of the excessively liberal viewpoint and now think the article reflects reality better. The only thing I wasn't sure about was the Ernest Hemingway point, but but one exception does not a trend make. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 15:55, 19 October 2008 (EDT)