5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + +
no edit summary
::::NO. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:26, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
::::NO. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:26, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Well the article uses the phrase "reverse racism" in a way I've never heard it used. Do we have a cite where somebody used it as "groundless accusations of racism" rather than "racism by or for the benefit of those who have historically suffered from racism?" 'Cause that's what reverse racism means to me and everyone I know. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 15:23, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Well the article uses the phrase "reverse racism" in a way I've never heard it used. Do we have a cite where somebody used it as "groundless accusations of racism" rather than "racism by or for the benefit of those who have historically suffered from racism?" 'Cause that's what reverse racism means to me and everyone I know. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 15:23, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
::::::Ok I did post some links, but the spam filter blocked it so I lost my post. Ungtss, you are correct. Every cite I can find says that either reverse racism is "racism by or for the benefit of those who have historically suffered from racism" OR that that is the common definition, which isn't technically "reversed". Can't we just say that in the article? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:29, 20 October 2008 (EDT)