4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 285:
Line 285: + +
Talk:Young Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 18:10, October 21, 2008
, 18:10, October 21, 2008→Reactions to Criticism, Really?
: From decades of personal experience, I can say that these are common criticisms (it doesn't say that they are necessarily "the most widely use criticisms") and that the responses listed are, on the whole, the ones normally given by leading creationists.
: From decades of personal experience, I can say that these are common criticisms (it doesn't say that they are necessarily "the most widely use criticisms") and that the responses listed are, on the whole, the ones normally given by leading creationists.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:10, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:10, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
There are definitely problems with the term "bogus". The Reactions to Criticism section states the evolutionist argument against YEC as questionable the poses the YEC rebuttal as indisputable fact. Both views are, in fact, opinion. The word bogus would only properly be used to describe something that has been absolutely proven to be false. - [[User:highbrow|highbrow]]