Changes

== Amendment Recommendation ==

== Amendment Recommendation ==

Alright,  It's well understood that Wikipedia's chief admins tend to lean way left-of-center.  That's fine.  Our resentment isn't with the fact that they have a bias; it's that they're arrogant enough to still posture themselves as "neutral" in the process.  Hence, Conservapedia's existence--realistically, there wouldn't even be a Conservapedia if it weren't such a left-wing slant in many of Wikipedia's articles.   

Alright,  It's well understood that Wikipedia's chief admins tend to lean way left-of-center.  That's fine.  Our resentment isn't with the fact that they have a bias; it's that they're arrogant enough to still posture themselves as "neutral" in the process.  Hence, Conservapedia's existence--realistically, there wouldn't even be a Conservapedia if there weren't such a left-wing slant in so many of Wikipedia's articles.   

But just what is the main purpose of Conservapedia supposed to be?  I mean, the name suggests that we are not just some philosophically blank community of writers and editors.  We have a point of view, and we're not ashamed to put that view right in the very name of our site.  Otherwise, why bother naming the site something as direct as "Conservapedia"?

But just what is the main purpose of Conservapedia supposed to be?  I mean, the name suggests that we are not just some philosophically blank community of writers and editors.  We have a point of view, and we're not ashamed to put that view right in the very name of our site.  Otherwise, why bother naming the site something as direct as "Conservapedia"?