221
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 28:
Line 28: +
→Better article elsewhere
::Are you suggesting that the Wikipedia article is effectively useless? I think there's every reason to use wikis, so long as the articles are well referenced, as that one is. This article is hardly core values Conservapedia material, hence why publish a weaker article? [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 19:57, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
::Are you suggesting that the Wikipedia article is effectively useless? I think there's every reason to use wikis, so long as the articles are well referenced, as that one is. This article is hardly core values Conservapedia material, hence why publish a weaker article? [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 19:57, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:::I'm not saying you aren't right, I'm saying that linking to WP defeats the whole purpose of having ''this'' wiki. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:03, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:::I'm not saying you aren't right, I'm saying that linking to WP defeats the whole purpose of having ''this'' wiki. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:03, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:::BHarlan - your most recent edit comment suggested that "Wikipedia is useful only as a citation for things that are liberal". But this article isn't about liberal or conservative ''anything'', is it? A guy was assaulted in a pretty hideous way, the bad guy went to jail, and an award was made to the unfortunate victim. I can't see the harm in simply saying "there's a better article elsewhere, go read it"? Especially for an article so way out of left field for Conservapedia? I'm sorry if I'm wrong, but I can't see the logic? It's not even really a 'child-friendly' story? [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 20:06, 22 October 2008 (EDT)