221
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + +
→Better article elsewhere
::::I think that actualy is the purpose of this wiki. I tried to look around for the page that explains why the wiki was started, but I can't seem to remember where it is anymore. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:15, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
::::I think that actualy is the purpose of this wiki. I tried to look around for the page that explains why the wiki was started, but I can't seem to remember where it is anymore. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:15, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
::::I think [[Conservapedia:About|this]] is what I was thinking of. The rest is spread across various talk pages over the last 2 years. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:16, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
::::I think [[Conservapedia:About|this]] is what I was thinking of. The rest is spread across various talk pages over the last 2 years. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:16, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Interesting. "The starting point for increasing your knowledge, your faith and the well-being of you and those around you is to understand concepts better. Conservapedia enables you to do that". But shouldn't a resource that tries to guide people to information actually ''do'' that? If information is out there that is factually correct and without bias (as in this criminal case), shouldn't readers/surfers/students be pointed in that direction? Isn't declining to link to that resource actually counter-productive and counter knowledge? What is the point, if not to inform? [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 20:23, 22 October 2008 (EDT)