5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
Talk:Racial censorship (view source)
Revision as of 01:22, October 23, 2008
, 01:22, October 23, 2008→Delete?: new section
Once again, such a topic should be a debate, not an article. You write this as a article in a self-described "trustworthy" encyclopedia, while only giving one example from a radio talking-head. Come on! You can do better then this! [[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 22:04, 4 March 2008 (EST)
Once again, such a topic should be a debate, not an article. You write this as a article in a self-described "trustworthy" encyclopedia, while only giving one example from a radio talking-head. Come on! You can do better then this! [[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 22:04, 4 March 2008 (EST)
== Delete? ==
Don't get me wrong I love Walter Williams (more than most), but if you do a Google search for pages which contain the phrases "racial censorship" and "affirmative action" but ''don't'' contain the phrases "Walter Williams" or "Rush Limbaugh", there are exactly [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22racial+censorship%22+-%22Walter+E.+Williams%22+-%22Walter+Williams%22+-%22Rush+Limbaugh%22+%22affirmative+action%22 14 hits], leading me to believe that this term isn't used in the context given in the article by anyone but two men. If you remove "affirmative action" from the search requirements, you only get [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22racial+censorship%22+-%22Walter+E.+Williams%22+-%22Walter+Williams%22+-%22Rush+Limbaugh%22&btnG=Search 401] hits, leading me to believe that ''nobody'' uses the term, even when they are talking about a different definition than what is in the article. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)