221
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 45:
Line 45: + +
→Better article elsewhere
I get that, yes. But there's absolutely no benefit in this article being shoddy, so why don't we just delete it? If it's outside the scope of reference, that's fine. But anyone who wanted to find out about Abner Louima shouldn't come to Conservapedia. [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 22:55, 22 October 2008 (EDT)[[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
I get that, yes. But there's absolutely no benefit in this article being shoddy, so why don't we just delete it? If it's outside the scope of reference, that's fine. But anyone who wanted to find out about Abner Louima shouldn't come to Conservapedia. [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 22:55, 22 October 2008 (EDT)[[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:Then expand the article! Everything is a work in progress, and it's silly to expect every article to be better than Wikipedia's from the start. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:Then expand the article! Everything is a work in progress, and it's silly to expect every article to be better than Wikipedia's from the start. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
::No, sorry. If I felt like contributing to the world's store of Abner Louima knowledge, it would make more sense for me to add that to the already excellent Wikipedia article rather than attempt to build a second Eiffel Tower, if you get my drift. Don't get me wrong - I'm not interested in Abner Louima, I'm only involved here by accident. It just seemed to be a good example of something left out of Conservapedia, that's all. [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 00:01, 23 October 2008 (EDT)