426
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
Talk:Female Genital Mutilation (view source)
Revision as of 17:47, October 23, 2008
, 17:47, October 23, 2008→That word
Using that word and not defining it will only cause unmarried users to go searching for more information using [[Yahoo]]. This may lead to all sorts of inappropriate behavior. Why not just leave the word off? If There was a page about "liver mutilation", I would just accept it on face value. If it mentioned certain parts of the liver, I would be tempted to investigate more. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 13:43, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
Using that word and not defining it will only cause unmarried users to go searching for more information using [[Yahoo]]. This may lead to all sorts of inappropriate behavior. Why not just leave the word off? If There was a page about "liver mutilation", I would just accept it on face value. If it mentioned certain parts of the liver, I would be tempted to investigate more. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 13:43, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
:medical terms used in a medical manner are not "sexualized". and to suggest somehow that this will make "unmarried persons" run off and look it up is seriously flawed. Why not create a medical related page, here, that explains what "that word" is, and what it means in a medical sense. For goodness sake, we are conservative, but that doesn't mean we should hide from important world discussions or educate ourselves about what important issues abound.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 13:47, 23 October 2008 (EDT)