3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + +
Talk:Large Hadron Collider (view source)
Revision as of 20:14, October 23, 2008
, 20:14, October 23, 2008→Discovering muons?: new section
:: To be clear, there is no concern in the scientific community. If there was they wouldn't have built the LHC (or any other supercollider) in the first place. As for the microscopic black holes, even if despite the infinitesimal odds one did form, it would die out nearly instantly due to Hawking radiation. It wouldn't have a large enough mass to sustain itself. You'd need something massive (a star) in order to create a self-sustaining black hole. There is ''nothing'' to be worried about. --[[User:Rspeed|Rspeed]] 00:33, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
:: To be clear, there is no concern in the scientific community. If there was they wouldn't have built the LHC (or any other supercollider) in the first place. As for the microscopic black holes, even if despite the infinitesimal odds one did form, it would die out nearly instantly due to Hawking radiation. It wouldn't have a large enough mass to sustain itself. You'd need something massive (a star) in order to create a self-sustaining black hole. There is ''nothing'' to be worried about. --[[User:Rspeed|Rspeed]] 00:33, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
::: unless somewhere in the calculations someone divided by zero! --[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 03:35, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
::: unless somewhere in the calculations someone divided by zero! --[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 03:35, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
== Discovering muons? ==
Muons have been known to exist for decades, and should be removed from this article, and gluons are not leptons, they are bosons, force mediators. Neither should be mentioned