560
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Talk:Female Genital Mutilation (view source)
Revision as of 21:10, October 23, 2008
, 21:10, October 23, 2008no edit summary
::I think it's clear this is a matter of scale, since even liberals like youself wouldn't want to put up an FGM instruction manual here, even though it would be "informative".
::I think it's clear this is a matter of scale, since even liberals like youself wouldn't want to put up an FGM instruction manual here, even though it would be "informative".
::I did not and do not think you were mocking. I think you merely haven't thought through all the consequences of liberalism in this case. I will not speculate on the causes liberalism in general. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:42, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
::I did not and do not think you were mocking. I think you merely haven't thought through all the consequences of liberalism in this case. I will not speculate on the causes liberalism in general. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:42, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
:::BHarlan, nobody is proposing any kind of instructional content here; & please don't throw around accusations of liberalism as it is not a productive way to discuss article content. This is not a political issue & you cannot judge other editors' political beliefs based on it.
:::The reasons young people often do not wish to talk to their parents or priest about sexual issues, puberty or genitals are primarily due to embarrassment. They may look for information on the internet instead. Which would you rather: that they can find some concise factual information on Conservapedia (about the clitoris for example, or the penis), or that - because they can't find the information on Conservapedia - they try searching with these words on Google instead? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 17:10, 23 October 2008 (EDT)