Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
Debate: Is it possible for God to be timeless? (view source)
Revision as of 13:57, October 24, 2008
, 13:57, October 24, 2008→Yes: Link to omnipresence
I thought relativity stated that time is relative to the speed of movement in the spatial dimensions. In this way I dont think relativity addresses so much the existence of a continuum but how the rate of this continuum is relative to movement. -Barnes
I thought relativity stated that time is relative to the speed of movement in the spatial dimensions. In this way I dont think relativity addresses so much the existence of a continuum but how the rate of this continuum is relative to movement. -Barnes
:I agree that time is a continuum, but the idea that one's position in time can be affected by movement in space suggests to me that it might be sensible to think of time in the same terms as the familiar spatial dimensions. If you follow my line of thought above, God can only be timeless if He is also omnipresent: do you believe it's possible for God to be omnipresent? If not, there's not much point pursuing this.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:57, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
== I don't know, and nor do you ==
== I don't know, and nor do you ==